مقاله Application of Boundary Element Methods for Plate Tectonic Deformation Modeling and its Comparison with Other Numerical and Analytical Methods با word دارای 16 صفحه می باشد و دارای تنظیمات در microsoft word می باشد و آماده پرینت یا چاپ است

فایل ورد مقاله Application of Boundary Element Methods for Plate Tectonic Deformation Modeling and its Comparison with Other Numerical and Analytical Methods با word کاملا فرمت بندی و تنظیم شده در استاندارد دانشگاه و مراکز دولتی می باشد.

این پروژه توسط مرکز مرکز پروژه های دانشجویی آماده و تنظیم شده است

توجه : در صورت  مشاهده  بهم ریختگی احتمالی در متون زیر ،دلیل ان کپی کردن این مطالب از داخل فایل ورد می باشد و در فایل اصلی مقاله Application of Boundary Element Methods for Plate Tectonic Deformation Modeling and its Comparison with Other Numerical and Analytical Methods با word،به هیچ وجه بهم ریختگی وجود ندارد

بخشی از متن مقاله Application of Boundary Element Methods for Plate Tectonic Deformation Modeling and its Comparison with Other Numerical and Analytical Methods با word :

سال انتشار: 1388

محل انتشار: همایش ژئوماتیک 88

تعداد صفحات: 16

نویسنده(ها):

Asghar Rastbood – Ph.D. Student in Geodesy at theFac ulty of Geodesy and Geomatics Eng.,K.N.Toosi University of Technology
Behzad Voosoghi – Assistant Professor of the Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Eng., K.N.Toosi University of Technology
Asghar Rastbood – Ph.D. Student in Geodesy at the Faculty of Geodesy and Geomatics Eng. K.N.Toosi University of Technology

چکیده:

Plate tectonic theory has provided a means to derive kinematics of plate margins, but analysis is limited when working on intra-continental deformation like Iran plateau because, by definition, plates are rigid and do not deform. Nevertheless, knowledge of the relative poles of rotation between two plates allows us to derive components of the deformation field in a diffusely deforming zone between two plates. Other methods to derive the strain field include the use of high precision surveying (e.g., global positioning satellite system [GPS]) and various geologic markers (e.g., faults, dikes, etc.). The former is limited to time-scales that may be more representative of inter- seismic deformation and in response to the activity of perhaps a limited number of faults in any particular region. In this case, these observations may not represent the long-term average. The use of geological markers may be limited by the local setting (e.g., influenced by local anomalies in the regional stress field) or, in a practical sense, by the extensive amount of data needed to determine the regional stress field.